Nobody will be more pleased about David Miliband stepping down than his younger brother Ed

Our Political Editor draws a parallel between what the former Foreign Secretary has done and what Tony Blair did when Gordon Brown succeeded him as Prime Minister

Andrew Grice
Thursday 28 March 2013 01:00 GMT
Comments
Former Foreign Secretary David Miliband talks to reporters at his home in London, England
Former Foreign Secretary David Miliband talks to reporters at his home in London, England (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Where does David Miliband’s departure leave Labour? At first glance, worse off without a “big beast” whose return to the front line would have enhanced its prospects of regaining power in 2015. The party’s opponents will portray it as the end of the Blairite era (again).

Ed Miliband would have preferred his brother to walk through his “open door” to the Shadow Cabinet room. But the next best option was for David to do what he has now done and left the building entirely. The “hanging around” option he has pursued since losing the 2010 Labour leadership contest was a very uncomfortable third way for both brothers.

His self-imposed exile across the Atlantic is not the “snub to Ed” portrayed by Conservative-supporting newspapers. They would have preferred David to keep “hanging around” so they could play up any tensions – real or imagined – between the Milibands.

In fact, David has done his brother – and the party he still loves – a favour by leaving the country. It is, in effect, what Tony Blair did so that he didn’t get in Gordon Brown’s hair after being succeeded as Prime Minister in 2007.

If you asked people in the Dog and Duck what Ed Miliband had done, the chances are that more would mention that he knifed his brother rather than say he replaced New Labour with One Nation Labour. Memories of his act of fratricide will fade once David departs.

Labour members and trade unionists used to call each other “brothers”. But there is only really room at the top for one brother in One Nation Labour. Now Ed will have the stage to himself, with no sibling noises off. It will be easier for him to display his wares, and in 2015 the voters will decide whether they want to buy.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in