Letter from the Social Media Editor: Social media can't handle complex news
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.
Social media can strip news of nuance. Twitter and Facebook are fantastic for breaking stories, making jokes and stretching headline writers, but they maul complicated current affairs. Online, we communicate in aphorisms, short bursts of feeling prompted by humour and outrage which move us all like a Mexican Wave, obscuring deeper issues.
You can see it now in the way social media is “discussing” Iraq. Tony Blair’s name marched into the fray to the Twitter equivalent of the Darth Vader theme tune at the weekend, and has dominated discussions since. We’ve got so hooked on blaming Blair that analysis is overshadowed by outrage.
A similar phenomenon is happening with Scottish independence. Bile and vitriol have replaced rational discussion. The situation is complex, filled with what-ifs, historic pain, and us vs them rhetoric. It’s easier to just insult everyone. JK Rowling said some of the independence campaigners used language that was a little “death eaterish”. Yet I watched the torrent of abuse that followed her announcement and I don’t remember Voldemort’s supporters swearing so much.
Malice spreads quickly and viciously online. EndFather’sDay was a hashtag campaign engineered to malign feminists by pretending that a group of women wanted to stop the patriarchy by banning Father’s day. It was ridiculous, but rivers of outrage continued to pour down timelines blurring our understanding.
Sometimes in our social media addiction, we ignore the negative ways Twitter can influence discourse. Social media is a privilege. Let’s all think before we tweet.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments