i Editor's Letter: The fatal gamble with fans’ lives

 

Oliver Duff
Thursday 16 April 2015 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

In my reporting on women's reproductive rights, I've witnessed the critical role that independent journalism plays in protecting freedoms and informing the public.

Your support allows us to keep these vital issues in the spotlight. Without your help, we wouldn't be able to fight for truth and justice.

Every contribution ensures that we can continue to report on the stories that impact lives

Kelly Rissman

Kelly Rissman

US News Reporter

Today’s cover story is shocking: a new book by Martin Fletcher, a Bradford City fan who in 1985 survived the club’s stadium disaster and lost his family, claims that eight other fires broke out at businesses owned by, or associated with, Bradford’s then chairman. It is impossible to draw firm conclusions from the finding – indeed, Mr Fletcher avoids doing so. Thirty years after the fire, and 20 years after the death of ex-chairman Stafford Heginbotham, we have no means to examine primary evidence afresh, and Mr Heginbotham has no chance to explain.

There is a clear public interest in Mr Fletcher’s work, though: the inquiry into the fire and 56 deaths was conducted with undue haste. Which modern judge’s inquiry would start only three weeks after a disaster, and hear five days of testimony? Regardless of these new claims, Mr Heginbotham was guilty of gross negligence bordering on criminality for gambling with fans’ lives. He ignored warnings about the fire risk of litter gathering beneath the stand. In the tinderbox’s charred remains, investigators found a copy of the Bradford Telegraph & Argus from 1968. The coroner later revealed that he considered a manslaughter charge against the club.

What happened after the fire was no less disgusting: nothing. Stadium safety should have been overhauled. Instead, key recommendations (tighter safety certificates, improved evacuation) were ignored. It took another four years, and the deaths of 96 at Hillsborough, before ministers and the national game acted.

I doubt there will be a new inquiry. I doubt much would be established if there were one. But Mr Fletcher’s book betrays the deficiency of earlier investigations, and shames those who failed to act.

i@independent.co.uk

Twitter.com: @olyduff

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in