Government counter-radicalisation plan: Not even Tony Blair went this far in alienating a community
Prevent, part of the counter-terrorism strategy, goes as far as targeting people based on their religious faith
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Home Office’s Prevent is one of the four elements that make up the UK’s post 9/11 counter-terrorism strategy known as Contest. They are Prepare for attacks, Protect the public, Pursue the attackers and Prevent their radicalisation in the first place.
Of these, Prevent is the most controversial as it is regarded as anti-Muslim because it targets people based on their religious faith.
In the wake of the 7/7 attacks in London, the Labour Government stepped up the programme spending tens of millions on hundreds of schemes across the country.
But many of these initiatives were regarded by the Muslims as little more than cover for police spying operations where organisations, all dependent on government funding, competed with each other to gather intelligence on their local communities.
In Birmingham, for example, a CCTV network in a Muslim part of the city was found to have been funded out of the Prevent budget.
Other programmes simply did not have the training or understanding to combat Islamist radicalisation.
Instead of stamping out extremism, the Prevent programme was actually alienating Muslim communities who began to view the strategy with deep suspicion.
There have been some successes as well, particularly in the one-to-one mentoring programmes and the police’s take-down unit which since Prevent was relaunched in 2011 has removed vast amounts of extremist material from the internet.
In the face of Isis and other terrorist groups based in Syria and Iraq, the Government has again decided to push Prevent to the fore. But the alarming rise in the number of terror arrests in the past year and the constant stream of British Muslims heading to Syria has underscored the ineffectiveness of the strategy.
The Government’s reaction to this is to push even harder and this year, ministers relaunched Prevent with a set of new policies once considered so radical that they were discarded by Tony Blair.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments