Daily catch-up: the Greeks can stay in the euro or end ‘austerity’, but not both
Plus American legal logic, Labour’s Tory defectors, lone wolves and French kissing
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.1. Syriza, the Greek coalition of the radical left that is so admired by the sort of people who made sure Labour lost here, has finally led its voters to the point where denial meets reality.
And yet Alexis Tsipras, the Greek prime minister, still refuses to face it, calling a referendum that asks a question pretending Greece can stay in the euro without having to abide by its rules. A leader would tell the Greeks they can have the euro or they can have an end to austerity. As Sean O’Grady explains, decoupling a currency need not be disastrous. Instead, Tsipras blames Germany for not giving Greece more money.
I can see why he is surprised. I thought Germany would pay up to preserve the euro, but Andrew Lilico was right in April when he predicted Greece would leave the euro this year.
2. “Because capital punishment is constitutional, there must be a constitutional means of carrying it out.” Yesterday’s US Supreme Court ruling, again by five to four, that midazolam could be used in lethal injections, opens with a striking example of legal argument.
It was notable that two justices, Stephen Breyer and Ruth Ginsburg, argued that the court should reconsider whether the death penalty is in fact compatible with the Constitution.
US law and therefore US politics is completely different from ours. As Spinning Hugo argues, on gun law and gay marriage, the US Supreme Court seems to have an entirely flexible interpretation of the words of the Constitution.
3. I am still transfixed by Electoral Calculus’s chart of how voters switched parties between 2010 and 2015 that I featured yesterday. Stephen Wigmore points out that Labour lost more voters to the Conservatives than to UKIP and asks: “Have any Labour leadership candidates mentioned that?”
4. Matthew d’Ancona’s column in The Guardian yesterday was good and clarifying on the “lone wolf” objection to opposing the ideology of Muslim grievance.
5. An important map, via Amazing Maps. How about “none”? Where is “none”?
6. And finally, thanks to Tom Freeman for this:
“I’m still disappointed that when I did combined sciences GCSE, they didn’t call it ‘omniscience’.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments