A two-tier motorway would be ineffective, unjust, and add to the government's pile of #Omnishables
Most people agree that we have a major problem with congestion. But is inserting a new class distinction into Britain's roads likely to solve the problem? Probably not
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.At last there is a chance to persuade the Government to step back from a fresh ‘Omnishambles’ proposal – the idea that there should be a two-tier road tax. Motorists paying the lower rate would be confined to driving only on local and smaller A-roads. Drivers paying the higher rate could spend all day driving round the M25 at no extra cost if they wanted to. This policy is under consideration but has not yet been given the go-ahead.
What would happen to some poor motorist who had paid the lower rate and started driving along a major A-road or even a motorway? Well, automatic number-plate recognition cameras would soon identify the rogue vehicle.
Think about this for a moment. It would insert a new class distinction into British society – between poor motorists and well-to-do motorists – which is the last thing we want. It doesn’t sit easily with the notion of us being "all in it together”. Or, to put it more generally, it emphasizes the gap between the haves and the have nots. It would be a mini version of George Osborne’s Omnishambles Budget when he reduced the top rate of income tax at the same time as announcing a range of measures that would fall on those with smaller incomes.
Now drawing attention to the widening gap between the haves and the have-nots, particularly acute in the USA and Britain, is not just a rhetorical flourish or an empty debating point. It refers to the fact that when a comparison is made between rich countries, those with high levels of inequality have more health and social problems than those with a less inequality. So it should be a ‘given’ of public policy that measures that would exacerbate the damaging loss of self-esteem, concerns about position and a growing sense of the ‘unfairness of it all’ that inequality breeds should be avoided. Which is why the Coalition should spend no more time considering a two-tier road tax.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments