Tim Walker: Enough with the sparking, please

Tales From The Water Cooler: A quick Google News search suggests more and more outrage is sparked every day, around the world

Tim Walker
Saturday 03 December 2011 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Jeremy Clarkson "sparked outrage" on Wednesday, according to The Independent and the Daily Mail. The Press Association said the Top Gear presenter "sparked widespread outrage", while The Guardian claimed he "sparked a storm of outrage.

A lady shouting racist insults on a tram also "sparked outrage" this week, if you believe the Mirror, which insisted the all-male shortlist for BBC Sports Personality of the Year had "sparked outrage" too.

In fact, a quick Google News search ("sparked" + "outrage") suggests more and more outrage is sparked every day, around the world. Michael Gove sparked outrage in the education community. Reality star Vinny from Jersey Shore sparked outrage in the US. Sepp Blatter "sparked international outrage". Another search, on Google Books, reveals a steady upward curve in instances of "sparked outrage" since 1960, with a marked acceleration since the 1990s and, it so happens, the spread of the internet.

Twitter makes the sparking of outrage a lot more easily quantifiable. One need only study the trending topics, or search for, say, "Gervais", to witness outrage being sparked in real time. Nowadays, complainants to the BBC can register their outrage online the moment it is sparked, without having to talk to an actual person on a phone: thus any outrage sparked is quickly expressed, the better to be measured and reported upon by the media.

Perhaps outrage was always there, like gas leaking gently from the cracks in society, waiting to be sparked by Clarksons and Blatters and Brands. Or perhaps it's not "outrage" they "sparked" at all. Perhaps Clarkson merely sparked a fart of mild annoyance in a lot of bored Twitter users, who just happened to think he's a bit of a knob.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in