We should close Everest off from tourists for good – mountains like these deserve respect

I have trekked in Nepal, but would never visit again. What the tourists have done to the place turned me off entirely

Janet Street-Porter
Friday 14 April 2017 16:23 BST
Comments
Nepal needs tourists, but does it have to destroy the environmental gems that make it so special?
Nepal needs tourists, but does it have to destroy the environmental gems that make it so special? (AFP)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

I’ve climbed over 17,000 feet several times, and not really enjoyed it. Altitude sickness is a bummer over 15,000 feet, and the last time – on the summit of an extinct volcano on the edge of the Atacama Desert in Northern Chile – I blacked out and had to swig oxygen on my way down.

Yes, the views from the top of any peak are remarkable, but I doubt I’ll be repeating the experience. It won’t be simply for health reasons: I’ve come to respect mountains, and the way they are used for kicks by a “look-at-me” generation just makes me despair.

I’ve trekked in Nepal, but would never visit again – the desecration of small villages, some of which have dug up every field for campers to pitch tents, and the obscenity of poverty-stricken porters in rags ferrying Coca Cola and fizzy drinks up thousands of feet to spoilt hikers, has turned me. Nepal needs tourists, but does it have to destroy the environmental gems that make it so special?

In 2015, a Nepalese earthquake killed 9,000 people, and 18 died trying to ascend Everest – no one reached the summit. In 2016, five people died and 640 were successful, half of whom were Sherpas guiding rich clients who now spend between $35,000 and $85,000 on the trip. Don’t tell me this is essential to the local economy, because the amount porters and guides are paid is pitiful.

Everest Featurette - IMAX

The Nepalese government charges $11,000 for a permit to climb the peak, but that is no deterrent. The mountain is littered with rubbish and bodies – so if we really care about the environment, why not leave Everest in peace as a monument and a memorial to those who remain entombed there?

As it is, reality TV crews stalk climbers and flog the footage of accidents to the highest bidder, in return for paying for helicopter rescue. The climbing season has just begun, with record numbers expected, and an 85-year-old Sherpa is attempting to be the oldest person ever to summit. DJ Paul Oakenfold has just held “the highest party on earth” at base camp last week, which is going to be turned into an album and a documentary, with proceeds going to local charities. Mountains deserve our respect – so let’s close Everest for good.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in