Why not having kids is my gift to the environment

Thanks to the ever depleting ozone layer, I have a legitimate reason not to have offspring

Harriet Minter
Friday 08 June 2018 16:31 BST
Comments
One fewer child per family would have the same effect on the planet as 684 teenagers deciding to become serious recyclers for the rest of their lives, according to research
One fewer child per family would have the same effect on the planet as 684 teenagers deciding to become serious recyclers for the rest of their lives, according to research (iStock/Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Last week, I wrote about my struggle between embracing a vegan lifestyle for the sake of the environment and my love of a good spaghetti bolognese. Apparently, I’m not alone in this as my Twitter feed became a confession box of wannabe but failing vegans. One of them, however, noted that dropping meat from my diet wasn’t in fact the best thing I could do for the planet. If I really wanted to prove my eco-credentials then the simplest way to do that, involving literally no change to my lifestyle, was not to have kids.

Last year, researchers from Sweden found that one fewer child per family would have the same effect on the planet as 684 teenagers deciding to become serious recyclers for the rest of their lives. This piece of knowledge has cheered me no end, thank god I’ve finally found a legitimate reason to be able to say, “I don’t want children”.

It is a sad fact, acknowledged amongst child-free women of a certain age, that saying you’re quite happy keeping your home a toddler free zone is a somewhat controversial opinion. At a very young age I knew I didn’t want to have children; I was horrified whenever anyone gave me a doll (why on earth would I want a doll when I could have a book?) and frankly terrified the first time my mother signed me up to babysit the neighbour’s two-year-old. The evening ended in me calling my mother and her settling him to bed while I hid downstairs. My biological clock is on permanent snooze and yet this lack of interest in children seems to make others view me in a way that they simply wouldn’t if I was a man.

The reality is that a lack of desire to have children doesn’t make you uncaring; I nurture friendships, ideas and my rather needy dog, but I have no desire to add children to that list. And now, thanks to the ever depleting ozone layer, I have a legitimate reason not to.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in