Checkmate! Women succeed on the board

Thursday 29 December 1994 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Are women as intelligent as men? You could hardly ask this question, even before the era of political correctness. Yet one puzzle, beloved by the intellectual misogynist tendency, remained unsolved. Why are there no great women chess players?

This week, for the first time in its 100-year history, the Hastings International Chess Congress began with five women among the 10 invited players for its Premier Tournament, the biggest event in the British chess calendar. The antics of some of the leading (male) exponents show that chess is not a pure test of intelligence. But high-level, specialised, abstract reasoning remains the most important attribute of a strong player.

The popular notion is that women are better than men at verbal tasks, worse at mathematical ones - and chess is a mathematical game. This is a myth. Such sex differences, if they exist, are tiny. In any case, some psychologists say that the best players cope with the incalculability of chess by using skills that are more linguistic than mathematical.

Another myth about the chess anomaly is that women are better at interpretative skills; men are more creative. This is specious nonsense. Chess has now been studied so thoroughly that it is largely interpretative rather than creative. Creativity, anyway,is assessed by subjective criteria, set by men.

Twenty-five years ago two Hungarian educationists, Laszlo and Klara Polgar, designed a teaching method to rear geniuses. They chose chess - with its objective, win-or-lose scoring - as the testing ground. Their youngest daughter, Judit, did much to shatter prejudices about women players. She became the youngest player to earn the grandmaster title, and is now ranked 20th in the world.

Other women players lifted their sights accordingly. The Hastings tournament is a small part of a much wider social experiment in unisex intellectual competition. Cultural expectations and conditioning have, perhaps even more in chess than elsewhere, combined to stifle the aspirations of women. In the minds of most grandmasters, male and female, there is a lingering doubt about whether women really can play chess. The events in Hastings may play their part in dispelling such doubts.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in