Namibia's Environment Minister rejects criticism over trophy hunting
Minister Shifeta defended Namibia's position in a lively debate with Kenya's former Cabinet Secretary of Environment, Professor Judi Wakhungu
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
Namibia's current and Kenya's former ministers for environment engaged in a lively discussion about the polarising issue of trophy hunting at a debate held in at The Arts Club in London on Monday 25 March.
Professor Judi Wakhungu, Kenya’s former Cabinet Secretary of Environment, Water, and Natural Resources, said that her country’s position on hunting is “diametrically opposed” to that of her co-panelist Pohamba Shifeta, Minister of Environment and Tourism in Namibia since 2015.
Professor Wakhungu said ““In Kenya we believe a live animal is worth more over its lifetime than a one off killing. Elephant hunting was made illegal in 1973, followed by a ban on all animal hunting in 1977. Since then our elephant population has been growing steadily, and our rhino breeding programme has been successful.”
Namibia permits the controlled and authorised hunting of wildlife. Minister Shifeta countered Professor Wakhungu's point, saying that ‘conservation hunting’ makes a valuable contribution to both eco-tourism and employment levels.
“In Namibia conservation hunting is highly regulated and employs people in their thousands,” said Minister Shifeta. “It contributes more than half a billion Namibian dollars a year.”
He added: “As long as there are tough penalties in place against illegal wildlife killing and people behave according to protocols, hunting can play an important role in the long term protection of wildlife.”
In Namibia around 20% of conservancy revenues come from hunting. The money generated is used to increase anti-poaching policing and relocate animals, as well as being funneled back into the local community to build waterholes and infrastructure.
The debate – called Killing for Conservation - was chaired by Dr Max Graham, Founder and CEO of the international conservation charity Space for Giants, and held at The Arts Club, Mayfair. The panelists were joined by Professor Phyllis Lee, a renowned animal behaviourist who worked on the longest-running elephant research project in Kenya.
As Botswana considers lifting its ban on elephant hunting, Professor Lee said that what urgent action and sustained investment is needed to protect wildlife for future generations. She cited the example of critically endangered Rwanda’s mountain gorillas whose prospects for survival have improved thanks to years of conservation measures.
Professor Lee said “[The issue of] hunting is being framed as a debate of bad guys in the West telling Africa what to do. But African voices do not want to see their environment trashed and their wildlife eaten.”
Kenya and Namibia are home to some of the world’s largest remaining populations of free roaming elephants and black rhinos, as such the decisions they makes about wildlife carry global significance.
As the next meeting of CITES, the global treaty that regulates wildlife trade, approaches on 23 May, Professor Lee concluded that the role of trophy hunting is an planetary issue, and not just one for African nations to decide upon.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments