Without migrant workers, Boris Johnson’s promises of new homes and HS2 will remain a fantasy

The PM’s tub-thumping announcements will require a significant infrastructure recruitment drive – but with an immigration crackdown, where will these workers come from?

 

Clive Docwra
Sunday 23 February 2020 11:26 GMT
Comments
Priti Patel wrongly claims there are 8m 'economically inactive' Brits who can replace immigrants

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The government’s plans to deny visas to low-skilled workers are going to affect many industries, but arguably none more so than the construction sector.

That’s because the building industry has, since the last recession, relied heavily on migrant workers. That downturn meant when construction projects were curtailed and domestic workers left the industry, foreign-born labour was easily accessible once business picked up again, because of the skills shortages that existed in the UK-born workforce. Figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) show that EU nationals now comprise a crucial part of the construction workforce, accounting for around 8 per cent of all construction workers in the UK, 28 per cent in London.

This migrant labour source has also helped the industry counter the shortfall of apprentices. According to the Construction Industry Training Board, the industry needs to fill some 168,500 new jobs over the next five years, and grow much more of its own domestic workforce, given the limits on future access to migrant workers after Brexit. But the latest government figures show the number of people starting an apprenticeship in England (overall, not just in construction) fell to 125,800 between August and October last year, down 4.7 per cent from 132,000 in the same quarter a year earlier.

At the same time, the sector is being squeezed at the other end. ONS figures show that in 2011, one in every five UK-born construction workers was aged over 55 – meaning that by 2021, those people will nearly have reached retirement age, about the same time that any limits on migrant workers will kick in. Restricting access to all-important migrant labour could sound the death-knell for many construction companies.

The government also has little understanding of what constitutes a skilled worker in the construction sector. Immigrants recruited into the industry from abroad today are highly skilled tradesmen and women far removed from the Brexiteers’ stereotype. On the upside, the government is proposing that the shortage occupation list – the official list of occupations for which there are not enough resident workers to fill vacancies – will now include carpenters and plasterers. Bewilderingly, however, the list will still not include many of the other trades that are crucial for fulfilling a building project, such as bricklayers, plumbers and electricians.

Moreover, there’s a bigger issue here to which the government seems blind. Boris Johnson’s tub-thumping announcements on HS2 and home-building were designed to “cement the red wall”, but this frenzy of promised infrastructure will require a significant infrastructure recruitment drive – where are the workers going to come from?

The industry is already fearful of skills shortages. In a survey of more than 400 housebuilders carried out by McBains last year, fewer than half of respondents (48 per cent) thought that the government’s housebuilding target was achievable. Of those who didn’t, the second most popular reason was that there was not enough skilled labour (cited by 40 per cent of respondents).

Two things need to happen. Firstly, the government needs to add more skilled trades to the shortage occupation list. And second, it needs to extend freedom of movement beyond 31 December to allow foreign-born workers to bridge the gap while more homegrown workers are trained. It takes around three to four years to train a bricklayer, so in the short to medium term, the industry needs to be able to continue to access migrant labour in a number of key professions.

The workforce required for major or highly technical projects is seldom met by the local market. This means that the industry needs a highly flexible, in part itinerant, workforce to call on, and it is vital that the sector is able to recruit from abroad. If they can’t, the government’s proposals won’t just harm the construction business – they will wreck Boris Johnson’s dream of an infrastructure boom.

Clive Docwra is managing director of McBains, a consulting and design agency specialising in property, infrastructure and construction

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in