Bandits, not ethnicity, to blame in Sierra Leone : LETTERS

Stephen P. Riley
Thursday 02 February 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Mr Stephen P. Riley Sir: I am glad that you have covered in detail the seemingly endless and brutal civil war in a little reported part of West Africa ("Sierra Leone dissolves into anarchy", 31 January). As a visitor to Sierra Leone since 1978, and as a former lecturer at the university there, I agree that it is time that these issues are fully debated in the British press. However, your report exaggerates the ethnic element involved, and draws inaccurate and probably alarmist comparisons with Rwanda and Liberia.

There is no previous bloody history of ethnic conflict in Sierra Leone. Until 1991 it was a mostly peaceful, if ill-governed, country in desperate economic straits. The origins of the civil war are to be seen in the unscrupulous banditry and asset-stripping of several poorly organised rebel groups, mostly composed of former Sierra Leonean soldiers.

Since 1991, one of these, Foday Sankoh's Revolutionary United Front (RUF), has looted the state's resources, starting in the rich agricultural and diamond-producing areas in the east and south of the country (where the population happens to be Mende, Kono and Vai). Liberia's warlords have also had a hand in stirring up the conflict, but that country's recent grim history isn't necessarily a portent of Sierra Leone's future.

The taking of Western hostages from November last year, and the recent attacks upon expatriate mining companies, have humiliated the shaky multi-ethnic military government of Valentine Strasser and handed a powerful bargaining tool to the rebels.

Sankoh's RUF has been emulated by a number of other shadowy groups, including disaffected soldiers, supporters of the former President Joseph Momoh, and mercenaries from the neighbouring state of Liberia. Sporadic attacks on towns all over the country, as the rebels struggle for booty, also indicate the lack of an ethnic dimension. This isn't ethnic genocide. It is the unlawful accumulation of wealth, often using terror, in a desperately poor country.

The conflict illustrates two depressingly common features of many small African states in the 1990s. It is an indication of their political weakness when faced with determined attacks by mercenary-minded rebel groups. It is also a graphic reflection of their economic fragility when the state's economy is seriously undermined by spasmodic conflict and disorder in the major mineral export areas. There is little hope for such states until legitimate central authority can effectively quash such threats.

Yours faithfully, Stephen P. Riley Reader in Politics Staffordshire University Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in