ANOTHER VIEW; Grand designs for Greenwich

Sir Patrick Cormack
Thursday 23 November 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The old order changes and buildings cannot remain immune, however hallowed they may be. All over the country there are churches that have been declared redundant and converted into concert halls and libraries and even homes. But when a public building of national importance can no longer be used for its intended purpose there is a national responsibility, vested in the Government, to ensure that any new use is entirely seemly.

This is a responsibility that has not been effectively discharged in the case of County Hall. As I look across from the House of Commons, I see one of the most notable buildings of the 20th century empty and forlorn. I would have kept it as the headquarters of a directly elected London local government, for all that I was no great enthusiast for many of the activities of the old Greater London Council. But when Margaret Thatcher's view prevailed, how many thought it would lie desolate for so many years awaiting its fate as a Japanese hotel - and aquarium? Further down the Thames there is a much greater building - indeed, a series of buildings forming one of the few World Heritage Sites in this country - that of Greenwich.

I never thought I would see the day, peace dividend or no, when a magisterial building designed by Christopher Wren, and where Nelson lay in state before his burial, would be advertised in the pages of a glossy magazine - albeit that it was Country Life and the description rightly made it sound like an extremely special riverside property. For government ministers to be so bereft of ideas about its future as to resort to such a strategy saddened me considerably. I hope the cries of anguish and protest that have reverberated over the past couple of months will have convinced those with a responsibility for Greenwich that we cannot allow another County Hall situation here.

It is not change, as such, that I oppose. Greenwich was used as a palace and a hospital before it became a college, and there is no reason why it should not engender as much public pride in a new incarnation. Some have talked of another great art gallery, or an expanded maritime museum, and others of a campus for a university. What is crucial is that the Chapel and the Painted Hall and the rest of Wren's grand design should have a truly national purpose and that the building should be a living one.

What about a public service college? That would be a splendid millennium project. Maybe we could even have classes for Members of Parliament!

The writer is Conservative MP for Staffordshire South.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in