After forcing a family to have their cat put down, the RSPCA needs to rethink its priorities
There is a risk that, in marrying the role of fundraising, campaigning and prosecuting, the RSPCA has bitten off more than it can chew
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The RSPCA’s behaviour, with respect to the Byrnes family and their cat, Claude, marks a nadir for the animal charity. It wrongly charged the Brynes in public with mistreating their cat – a charge that was dismissed when the CPS ruled there was insufficient evidence.
It took the animal from the family – despite lacking the legal authority to do so. And it had Claude put down – without letting the devastated Byrnes children say goodbye.
Such actions give weight to the suspicion that the charity has become a shrill, heavy-handed organisation, out of touch with the public and increasingly in hock to the more extreme brand of animal rights activists.
The RSPCA has publicly apologised to the Byrnes for its actions in taking Claude, and for its incorrect decision to prosecute them.
Part of the problem lies with leadership. The charity’s last CEO resigned two years ago. Two weeks ago, a replacement, Jeremy Cooper, was announced, but not before reports that three candidates had pulled out because of concerns with governance structure.
Mr Cooper has quite a task on his hands if he is to rehabilitate the reputation of his employer. The RSPCA’s own report into the Byrnes family saga – leaked on Tuesday – is damning in the extreme. But Mr Cooper should not lament the bad publicity. Now is the time to own up, admit mistakes and move on.
The charity would do well to think more carefully before bringing private prosecutions in future. It pursues more of them than any other organisation in the country: going after the Byrnes in court added insult to injury. That the charity has passed over hunting prosecutions to the state points in the right direction.
There is a risk that, in marrying the role of fundraising, campaigning and prosecuting, the RSPCA has bitten off more than it can chew. An ongoing MPs review may strip them of the right to prosecute entirely – but that would be to take matters a step too far.
With more judicious management, the RSPCA can manage its duties and return to its founding principles. Over to you, Mr Cooper.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments