Travel: Plane crazy
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.QUESTION 2. Two flights are scheduled to depart at 8.30am every Saturday from Brussels to Heathrow, using identical aircraft. Whose interests does it serve to have two 737s, one Sabena, one BA, leaving at the same time rather than spacing out the services - or giving one landing slot to another airline? And unless they are going to fly and land in formation, one plane is bound to lose the race to Heathrow.
Last Saturday, one flight arrived 10 minutes early while the other was five minutes late. On so short a hop, a 15- minute discrepancy is hard to explain. Who decides which leaves first? Does air traffic control conduct a quick auction with the higher bidder winning the earlier take-off? Is one plane fitted with a turbocharger? Does one airline have better maps or a niftier route than the other? Perhaps a pilot, air traffic controller or Eurocrat could enlighten the rest of us. (Murphy's Law being what it is, of course, I chose the tardy flight.)
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments