Venice welcomes even stricter tourism rules – but some say it must go further
Venice’s historic centre had more than 170,000 residents in 1954. Last year, they were down to just over 49,000
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Visitors and locals to Venice alike welcomed new rules introduced on Thursday that limit the size of tourist groups in the latest effort to reduce overcrowding.
Tourist parties will be capped at 25 people and guides will be barred from using loudspeakers to help the flow of pedestrians and make it more peaceful for residents. It will also ban music being played through speakers.
“I think it’s right,” said 81-year-old local Edie Rubert.
“It would be better to reduce it more. Because you can’t walk along the narrow canalside streets when these groups are there,” she added, saying it was even worse when she needed to use her shopping trolley.
In April, Venice became the first city in the world to introduce a payment system for visitors in an experiment aimed at dissuading daytrippers from arriving during peak periods.
Sebastian Fagarazzi, co-founder of the ‘Venezia Autentica’ (Authentic Venice) Tourist Enterprise, said more action was needed.
“It’s probably a good decision in that regard, but it’s not going to be enough. Tourism in Venice has pushed out 72% of the inhabitants in the past 70 years, so 28% only remain today,” he said.
Venice’s historic centre had more than 170,000 residents in 1954, according to city authorities. Last year, they were down to just over 49,000.
Around 30 million tourists visit Venice in a typical year – with about seven out of 10 (or 21 million) staying only for the day. Just before the Covid pandemic, Unesco warned the city’s “status as a World Heritage property is in jeopardy”.
“As a consequence, it’s not enough to just make smaller groups or, for example, ask people to pay a small tourism tax. What must be done is to rethink tourism in order to support the local community,” added Fagarazzi, whose organisation aims to support more sustainable tourism.
The restrictions, which cover the city centre and also the islands of Murano, Burano and Torcello, also got a thumbs-up from some tourists themselves.
“Yeah, I think it’s good. I mean, it’s very, very congested in a lot of places,” said Mark Kerr, who was visiting from Scotland.
“In particular, yesterday we were at the St. Mark’s Basilica and the queues were massive to get in, so I think there’s a need to manage it, is probably the best way I can describe it.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments