Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

'Travel insurers have haphazard policies'

Sarah Schaefer
Thursday 13 April 2000 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Travel insurance companies came under attack yesterday for their "strange" and "haphazard" method of choosing which diseases to cover, described by a government minister as posing "all kinds of ethical questions".

Kim Howells, the minister for Consumer Affairs, said the Department of Trade and Industry was looking closely at how the travel insurance industry operated. At a debate in the Commons' parallel chamber in Westminster Hall, he launched an outspoken attack questioning the way in which insurance companies decided which conditions were "worthy" or "unworthy" of insuring.

He found it "very strange" that insurance companies were deciding influenza, for example, was an illness they were willing to cover - notwithstanding the fact that it was likely to cause someone to miss their holiday - whereas the same firms might not insure against HIV. "I suspect that it poses all kinds of ethical questions as well."

Dr Howells said he had paid "through the nose" for travel insurance. "It is a haphazard process at best. At worst, it stacks the odds against the person trying to obtain insurance." He also urged companies to make the policy details clearly visible, instead of burying them in small print that many found impossible to read without a magnifying glass.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in