First train strikes of the year cripple busy rail routes
Union boss warns things are ‘going to get worse’ while the prime minister called the pay offer ‘fair and reasonable’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Trains aren’t running on some of England’s busiest rail routes today, bringing travel misery for thousands as a fresh wave of strikes by drivers begins.
Members of the Aslef union are launching a week of walkouts in a long-running dispute over pay. Services had already been affected by a nine-day halt on overtime, which started on Monday (29 January).
Today sees drivers working on Southeastern, Southern/Gatwick Express, Great Northern, Thameslink and South Western Railway services strikes. The strike forced many people to drive to work, which led to huge traffic jams on roads, including the M25.
This will be followed by followed by walkouts at Northern Trains and TPE on Wednesday, at LNER, Greater Anglia and C2C on Friday, at West Midlands Trains, Avanti West Coast and East Midlands Railway on Saturday 3 February and at Great Western, CrossCountry and Chiltern on Monday 5 February.
South Western Railway urged passengers to only travel if “absolutely necessary” on Tuesday, warning that a significantly reduced service will operate on a limited number of lines.
A statement said: “Large parts of our network will be closed and trains will only run between 0700 and 1900. There will be no services outside of these times.”
Similar disruption will face all of the operators involved in the dispute. Where services do run, they are likely to start later and finish earlier than usual, and picket lines are likely to be mounted outside stations.
Mick Whelan, general secretary of Aslef, said some members have not had a pay rise for five years – and ministers have refused to engage with the union for a year. He has accused the government of “giving up” trying to resolve the row.
Last week, Mr Whelen told The Independent: “It’s going to get messier. It’s going to get worse.”
The strikes were expected to be the first test of the minimum service levels legislation, aimed at ensuring train operators could run 40 per cent of services.
But none of the train companies are using the new law, which the government is also planning to extend to other sectors.
Labour has said it will repeal the law if it wins the next general election.
Downing Street expressed disappointment at rail operators who are not using the minimum service levels legislation.
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak told the Daily Mail: “They’re available for train operators to use – a key tool that train operators themselves have asked for – to reduce the impact of disruption on passengers. They should now use them.
“Now, the public rightly expect them to be deployed when strike action is called and for train operators to act in the best interests of their passengers.”
Mr Sunak added Aslef should accept the “fair and reasonable pay deal that remains on the table”.
“It’s frustrating that yet again, Aslef’s leadership have shown no interest in resolving this dispute while continuing their campaign of contempt for British passengers and taxpayers, who have subsidised the railways with £12 billion in the past year alone,” he said.
“The choice for Aslef is clear – continue this act of self-harm to their industry and drive more passengers away from the railways, or they can accept the fair and reasonable pay deal that remains on the table.”
A Department for Transport spokesperson said: “Aslef’s leadership is refusing to let their members vote on an offer that would see the average train driver’s salary increase to £65,000.
“The Transport Secretary and Rail Minister have already facilitated talks that led to this fair and reasonable offer from industry. Aslef bosses should put it to their members so we can resolve the dispute, which has already happened with the RMT, TSSA and Unite unions.
“With passenger revenues not having recovered since the pandemic, the taxpayer has had to prop up the railways with £12 billion in the past year alone – these strikes will not change the need for urgent workplace reforms that Aslef continue to block.”
Additional reporting by agencies.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments