US pilots file lawsuit against federal mask mandate on planes
Face covering rules branded ‘an illegal and unconstitutional exercise of executive authority’ by plaintiffs
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A group of US pilots has filed a lawsuit over the country’s federal mask mandate, which stipulates that all passengers must wear a face covering on public transport, including on flights and at airports.
The 10 pilots span several airlines – JetBlue, Southwest Airlines and American Airlines – and claim that the Federal Transportation Mask Mandate is “an illegal and unconstitutional exercise of executive authority”, reports The Washington Examiner.
The suit has been lodged against the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and its parent organisation, the Health and Human Services Department, with plaintiffs alleging that the institutions “acted without” authorization and failed to follow the rulemaking process outlined by the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
“The mask mandate is procedurally defective because the defendants adopted it without following the APA's notice-and-comment requirements or considering the impact on tens of millions of travellers and transportation workers every single day,” reads the suit, which asks the court to rule that the mask mandate is unconstitutional.
Filed in the US District Court for the District of Columbia, the suit alleges that the mask mandate, first introduced in February 2021, has caused “chaos”, and claims the CDC “ignored countless scientific and medical studies” disproving the effectiveness of masks in preventing the spread of Covid-19.
“We have serious concerns about the safety implications of the mask mandate, none of which were studied by the CDC or HHS,” said the plaintiffs.
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) data shows that masks have been linked to a surge in disruptive passenger behaviour on board American flights - of 5,981 onboard disputes recorded on the country’s airlines last year, 72 per cent were related to masks.
The plaintiffs have also requested that authorities “remove all signs informing passengers” to wear a mask, and that they be awarded any costs and fees they incurred within the course of the suit.
Following an extension last week, the mask mandate is currently due to stay in place until at least 18 April.
The news comes after an announcement from London’s Heathrow airport that passengers are no longer required to wear a face covering.
The change applies across all of Heathrow’s terminals, bus and railway stations and office spaces. Heathrow says it mirrors steps taken by other transport organisations in the UK.
The airport’s chief operating officer, Emma Gilthorpe, said: “We’re gearing up for a busy summer travel season, and this change means we can look forward to welcoming our passengers back with a smile as we get them safely away on their journeys.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments