Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Influencer fined $285 after firing golf ball into Grand Canyon as a ‘prank’

Katie Sigmond has millions of social media followers

Helen Wilson-Beevers
Thursday 08 December 2022 14:20 GMT
Comments
The TikToker posted the video in October
The TikToker posted the video in October (Facebook / Grand Canyon National Park)

A social media influencer has been fined $285 after posting a video of herself firing a golf ball into the Grand Canyon on October 26.

Katie Sigmond has 7 million followers on TikTok and 3 million followers on Instagram, and is best known for prank videos, as well as both travel and golf-focused content.

The video – which has since been deleted – also shows Ms Sigmond apparently throwing the golf club into the canyon.

On 27 October Grand National Park posted on Facebook that “an individual posted a video to her personal TikTok page showing her hitting a golf ball and throwing a golf club into the canyon near Mather Point.”

“Grand Canyon Law Enforcement identified, located and contacted the individual responsible for the incident. Charges and a court appearance for the individual are pending,” the social media statement continues.

Grand Canyon Law Enforcement finished by saying: “Throwing objects over the rim of the canyon is not only illegal but can also endanger hikers and wildlife who may be below.”

On a Reddit thread discussing the incident, people were quick to share their opinions.

“These people should be banned from the national park system,” posted one user, while another replied: “I’d say no fine and make them find the club.”

Ms Sigmond was charged with disorderly conduct for creating a hazardous condition and tossing/throwing items to the canyon, which are both class B misdemeanours in the US federal courts system.

As such, she faced up to six months in prison and a maximum of $5,000 in fines.

She was fined $285 and this agreement was signed by Sigmond and federal authorities. The amount includes a processing fee of $60.

According to Stuff, Ms Sigmond also faced a third charge of littering, but this was dismissed providing she paid for the other misdemeanours.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in