Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Heathrow: airlines demand guarantee on expansion costs

‘History does not demonstrate that Heathrow is capable of delivering on time and on budget,’ says Willie Walsh, boss of IAG

Simon Calder
Travel Correspondent
Tuesday 20 February 2018 21:08 GMT
Comments
Master plan: Heathrow's depiction of an expanded airport
Master plan: Heathrow's depiction of an expanded airport (Heathrow Airport Ltd)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The UK’s leading airlines have demanded a guarantee that passenger fees will not increase at an expanded Heathrow.

British Airways’ parent company IAG, easyJet, Virgin Atlantic and Flybe were giving evidence to the Transport Select Committee,

Willie Walsh, chief executive of IAG, said Heathrow is the most expensive airport that his firm operates from, and that any increase in costs could mean “the third runway will become a white elephant”.

He was scornful of the airport’s record on major projects. “My confidence in ‘on time and on budget’ is zero,” he said, adding that it was “rare if ever” that a project had been on time.

Mr Walsh warned that UK domestic services could be hit by higher costs: “You will not get any additional connectivity and you could lose existing connectivity if the charges go up.”

All the airlines have urged cost savings on expansion. Sophie Dekkers, UK director for easyJet, said: “It’s important that it isn’t gold plated. The reason we haven’t gone into Heathrow is because we could not make it cost-effective.”

Heathrow Airport Ltd has identified savings of £2.5bn in its original estimate, reducing the cost to £14bn. But Dale Keller, chief executive of the Board of Airline Representatives in the UK said: “We don’t really believe the £14bn.”

Speaking for overseas carriers, he said: “There’s huge risk and uncertainty.”

Craig Kreeger, chief executive of Virgin Atlantic called for “a passenger cost guarantee”. Otherwise, he said, “The consequence of an overspend would be borne by the airline and its customers.”

He also said that existing users should not pay for future expansion: “Adding a pre-funding charge is completely unacceptable.”

Mr Walsh has called for competition between terminals, which he said is opposed by Heathrow: “They don’t want competition, because competition will put pressure on them.

“It would be very positive for consumers.”

A spokesperson for Heathrow rejected Mr Walsh’s criticisms, saying: “Since the opening of Terminal 5, both sides have learned considerable lessons and today Terminal 5 has been voted ‘world’s best terminal’ 5 years in a row.

“Heathrow has gone on to deliver Terminal 2 and numerous other projects on time and on budget.

“Willie Walsh’s comment suggesting we have no experience in doing so, is categorically untrue. Our expansion cost projections are equally robust and we will continue to work to reduce the cost further.

“Last year we confirmed potential cost savings of up to £2.5bn which illustrates our ongoing focus and progress in this area. It is a shame this hasn’t been recognised by Mr Walsh in this instance.”

The chief executive of the Civil Aviation Authority, Andrew Haines, called the third-runway scheme “the largest privately funded infrastructure project ever, anywhere in the world”.

He said that planning costs alone could amount to £500m, but said: “It would be possible to do this project as currently scoped at flat prices.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in