Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Air passengers unable to travel due to government restrictions may get refunds

Airlines argue the traveller had agreed to the terms and conditions

Simon Calder
Travel Correspondent
Wednesday 16 December 2020 09:51 GMT
Comments
Happier times: Gatwick airport before the coronavirus pandemic
Happier times: Gatwick airport before the coronavirus pandemic (Simon Calder)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Passengers prevented from taking flights because of government travel restrictions may be in line for cash refunds.

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has launched an investigation into whether airlines have breached consumers’ legal rights by failing to offer cash refunds for flights they could not lawfully access.

Tens of thousands of travellers in England who booked trips before the second lockdown was announced in November found themselves with flights they were unable to access due to strict rules on non-essential travel.

Travellers from the other UK nations have faced similar problems.

If the flight was subsequently cancelled – as many were – the passenger is due their money back in full within a week under European air passengers’ rights rules.

But where a flight went ahead, airlines either offered a voucher for future travel or – in the case of Ryanair and Wizz Air – enforced their normal flight-change rules and fees.

The CMA investigation will look at both cases. Andrea Coscelli, the chief executive, said: “We will be carefully analysing all the evidence to see whether any airlines breached consumers’ legal rights by refusing people cash refunds for flights they could not lawfully take.

“We recognise the continued pressure that businesses are currently facing, but they have a responsibility to treat consumers fairly and abide by their legal obligations.”

The standard coronavirus policy that the CMA has adopted is that in any contract frustrated by government action, the consumer should get their money back in full.

But carriers argue that of the seat on the flight was available, the fact that the holidaymaker could not legally access it was regrettable – but the traveller had agreed to the airline’s terms at the time of purchase.

While the CMA cannot itself issue fines, it can seek to enforce what it sees as breaches of consumer rights through the courts.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in