Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

EasyJet moves passenger’s flight to day before leisure travel permitted

‘I’m very curious as to their reasoning. What do they know that we don’t?’ – Tracy Harris

Simon Calder
Travel Correspondent
Monday 08 March 2021 17:14 GMT
Comments
Going places? An easyJet Airbus A320 at Gatwick airport
Going places? An easyJet Airbus A320 at Gatwick airport (Simon Calder)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Ten weeks before international travel from England is hoped to be made legal, easyJet has moved a passenger from a flight that would allow her to comply with the law to one that she could only take if her journey was deemed essential.

Tracy Harris booked an easyJet flight from London Gatwick to Barcelona for Monday 17 May, the first day when it could be feasible to go on a non-essential journey abroad.

However, easyJet cancelled Ms Harris’s original departure and instead offered her a flight on 16 May.

In an email informing Ms Harris of the flight change, easyJet did not explain that the current law means she could take the new flight only if her journey were essential.

Under the terms of the new Declaration to Travel law that took effect on 8 March, Ms Harris would face a £200 fine even for turning up at Gatwick without a form filled in explaining a reason for claiming exemption.

The European air passengers’ rights rules that still apply to UK-EU flights mean that she is entitled to “re-routing, under comparable transport conditions, to [her] final destination at the earliest opportunity”.

In other words, easyJet must offer to buy Ms Harris a ticket on another airline – which in this case would be on Vueling, which has seven departures on the same route on 17 May.

But easyJet advised Ms Harris only “three options that are available”: an alternative UK-Spain departure on easyJet; an easyJet voucher; or a refund.

She was told by easyJet: “Due to the ongoing impact of travel restrictions, we’ve had to review our schedule and we are sorry to inform you that your original flight from London to Barcelona has been cancelled.

“We’re trying to take as many people as possible on their travels and so we’ve done our best to move you onto an equivalent flight.”

The “equivalent flight” was a switch from a Monday morning departure to an afternoon service the previous day.

“I’m very curious as to their reasoning,” said Ms Harris. “What do they know that we don’t?”

According to the “roadmap” out of lockdown: “The government will determine when international travel should resume, which will be no earlier than 17 May.”

The Independent put these points to easyJet. In a statement, the airline said: “As we continue to consolidate our flying schedule the system moves customers to a flight with the nearest time and date. Unfortunately this has meant the option provided is in advance of the earliest date for the international leisure travel ban lifting and so although some customers are able to legitimately travel on this date for essential reasons others will not be able to do so.

“The customer has been provided with options that include them to be able to take the option to move to an alternative date after the 17 May if needed alongside their other options. If passengers wish to travel via an alternative carrier on 17 May they can contact our customer services who would arrange that for them. We are sorry for any inconvenience caused as a result of the earlier date.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in