Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Budget passengers wrongly charged for hand luggage

Peter Woodman
Friday 10 September 2010 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Passengers on the budget airline bmibaby may have been wrongly charged up to £60 because of hand-luggage measuring discrepancies, it emerged yesterday.

People flying on the airline can take bags on board for free if they are no bigger than a certain size. But an investigation by the BBC's Watchdog programme discovered that gauges at departure gates in at least three airports were too small for bags of the permitted size to fit inside.

Now bmibaby is to replace a number of measuring gauges. One of the airports was at East Midlands, the airline's main base. One passenger, Kirin Somaiya, 29, said he had flown with bmibaby from the airport and was told his hand luggage did not fit in the gauge, so he had to pay extra for it to be stored in the plane's hold. But when he got to Amsterdam's Schiphol Airport, he found his bag fitted into the gauges easily.

In response, bmibaby said that some of its gauges had been designed with curved edges, meaning that a piece of hard baggage which was exactly the same size as the maximum-allowed dimensions would not be able to fit inside.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in