BA crews to work new rotas until court hearing
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.British Airways cabin crew agreed "unwillingly" today to work the new schedules brought in by the airline until a full trial of the dispute next year.
After out-of-court discussions following a morning of legal submissions from counsel for the workers' union, Unite, the two sides agreed to come back on 1 February.
That estimated five-day hearing will resolve whether there should be a permanent injunction preventing BA from imposing cost-cutting proposals, which are due to start on 16 November.
BA says that it is entitled unilaterally to reduce cabin crew complements on board their Worldwide and Eurofleet flights as these are not terms of individual cabin crew members' contracts.
But Unite has said BA would be in breach of contract by imposing the changes as the existing crew complements were fixed by collective agreements with the unions and were "expressly incorporated" into their individual contracts of employment.
Its QC, John Hendy, told Mr Justice Butterfield at London's High Court that the changes would "materially and detrimentally affect the health and well-being of staff and passengers on board the flights".
BA's stance was that, while there would be a "modest increase in work output" for cabin crew, there were no health and safety concerns and the granting of an injunction would be a "commercial catastrophe".
After the trial date was agreed, Mr Hendy told the judge: "In the light of that fixture, my clients are prepared unwillingly to work the new schedules for the period of time up to the end of that trial."
The judge dismissed the application for an interim injunction, commenting: "The parties have come to a compromise which I may very well have reached if I had been left to determine the matter in any event."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments