Blue checkmarks on X trick users, EU claims
Paid-for ticks linked to ‘dark patterns’ in landmark investigation
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
The European Union has warned X (formerly Twitter) that its blue checkmarks for verified accounts may be being used to deceive users.
An investigation into the verification system, published on Friday, also found that it could be in violation of the EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA), which regulates illegal online content and disinformation.
The blue check system used to be a way to verify the authenticity of Twitter accounts that might be noteworthy or influential, such as those of celebrities, politicians and journalists. After Elon Musk bought the platform for $44 billion in October 2022, the tech billionaire overhauled the system to allow anyone willing to pay $8 per month to get a blue tick by their account name.
“Back in the day, Blue Checks used to mean trustworthy sources of information,” EU Commissioner Thierry Breton posted on Friday.
“Now with X, our preliminary view is that: they deceive users; they infringe DSA. X has now the right of defence – but if our view is confirmed we will impose fines and require significant changes.”
If found guilty, X faces a fine of up to 6 per cent of its global revenue.
According to the EU, the verification method can be linked to “dark patterns” that can be used by malicious actors to trick and mislead users.
It is the first time a major tech company has been charged under the EU’s new social media regulations since they came into force.
“In our view, X does not comply with the DSA in key transparency areas, by using dark patterns and thus misleading users, by failing to provide an adequate ad repository, and by blocking access to data for researchers,” EU competition chief Margrethe Vestager said in a statement.
“The DSA has transparency at its very core, and we are determined to ensure that all platforms, including X, comply with EU legislation.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments