Woman successfully sues Google for showing her with 'part of her breast exposed' on Street View
The woman reported a “significant loss of personal modesty and dignity"
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Google has been ordered to pay damages to a woman in Montreal after she was photographed by the company’s Street View cars sitting outside her house with “part of her breast exposed”.
Maria Pia Grillo argued that although her face was blurred in the image – which showed her leaning forward to check her phone and showing her cleavage – she remained readily identifiable as her car licence plate had been left un-blurred.
Tech site GigaOm reports that Grillo started legal proceedings against Google in 2011, asking the company to pay her $45,000 in damages.
Grillo reported suffering mockery from her co-workers at a “well-known bank” due to the image and the experienced a “significant loss of personal modesty and dignity.”
Google argued that as the picture had been taken in a public place the woman had no real expectation of privacy. Judge Alain Breault, however, rejected this, commenting that people did not forfeit their rights simply because they were in a location visible to others.
The internet giant was eventually ordered to pay $2,250 plus interest and $159 in court costs and the house was completely blurred along with Grillo’s image.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments