Twitter is bigger than Facebook, executive claims, despite fact rival has many more users

Numbers of users isn’t the best way of telling how many people are actually using the service, company’s chief financial officer argues

Andrew Griffin
Friday 18 September 2015 13:50 BST
Comments
The Twitter logo is displayed on a banner outside the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on November 7, 2013 in New York City
The Twitter logo is displayed on a banner outside the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on November 7, 2013 in New York City (Andrew Burton/Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Twitter is bigger than Facebook, according to one of its bosses, despite the fact that many fewer people use it.

Facebook says that it has 1.49 billion users, which is about 20 per cent of the world’s population, and Twitter most recently reported only 316 million users. But those numbers are the wrong way of measuring how many people are using the site, according to its chief financial officer Anthony Noto.

Noto told a technology conference this week that the size of the site depends “on how you measure it”. It may be that it is actually used and seen by more people than the numbers suggested, he claimed.

“I often get the question from friends [who] are like, ‘You know Facebook has over a billion users,’ and I’m like, ‘Well, we have an audience, depending on how you measure it, that’s pretty comparable’,” Quartz reports Noto as saying. “But they only have that audience, they only have the 1.4 billion they report, there’s no other number.

“We have other audience numbers that no one talks about and when you add those up it’s a big number, in fact in some scenarios you could argue that it’s bigger.”

Twitter has been struggling to convince people that it will be able to sustain its fast growth, as its number of users' stagnates. The company's shares have been dropping in value in recent months as investors worry that the site is unable to sign up new tweeters.

Noto’s argument is one that Twitter has made before — that the question of how much it is being used is not just about how many people logged into it, but also about the number of people who see tweets on the site without having an account, or look at posts when they are embedded by other publications and websites.

Last year, Twitter co-founder Evan Williams said that he didn’t “give a s***” about the number of users that the site has compared with Instagram, for similar reasons.

“If you think about the impact Twitter has on the world versus Instagram, it's pretty significant,” he said. “It's at least apples to oranges.

“Twitter is what we wanted it to be. It's this real-time information network where everything in the world that happens on Twitter - important stuff breaks on Twitter and world leaders have conversations on Twitter.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in