Chloe Madeley rape threats: Internet trolls 'to be imprisoned for two years' in new cyber crackdown

Justice Secretary Chris Grayling unveiled the new measures, which increases the current sentence fourfold

Natasha Culzac
Monday 20 October 2014 10:32 BST
Comments
Richard Madeley has said he is contacting the police over rape threats made to his daughter Chloe on Twitter
Richard Madeley has said he is contacting the police over rape threats made to his daughter Chloe on Twitter (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

People who post venomous and harassing messages online could face up to two years in prison, Justice Secretary Chris Grayling has pledged – an increase on the six months currently in place for perpetrators.

Unveiling the plans to the Mail on Sunday, Mr Grayling said “internet trolls are cowards who are poisoning our national life.”

The penalty for sending menacing, obscene or offensive communications is currently set at six months in prison, a level five fine up to £5,000, or both.

Cases are normally dealt with in Magistrates’ Courts, but the new measure will mean that they can be passed up to the Crown Court, which has increased power to hand out tougher judgements.

The sentences for those found guilty of stalking, harassment and fear of violence will, then, quadruple, though anyone who makes a direct threat to someone’s life can already been punished with 10 years in jail.

Mr Grayling said: “No one would permit such venom in person, so there should be no place for it on social media. That is why we are determined to quadruple the current six-month sentence.”

Web users who send vitriolic, harassing or menacing messages online could now face up to two years in prison
Web users who send vitriolic, harassing or menacing messages online could now face up to two years in prison (Getty)

His comments come days after Chloe Madeley, the daughter of Judy Finnigan and Richard Madeley, revealed that she had been on the receiving end of rape threats following her mother’s comments on the case of convicted rapist footballer Ched Evans.

Finnigan had appeared on ITV’s Loose Women to discuss the rehabilitation of Evans back into society amid his impending release from jail.

Justice Secretary Chris Grayling announced the new measures today
Justice Secretary Chris Grayling announced the new measures today (Reuters)

She said that he should get his job back, adding that the rape he was convicted of was “not violent”.

Following a slew of criticism at her remarks, Finnigan apologised “unreservedly” yet her daughter was sent vicious messages and threats, which her father, Richard, promised would be investigated.

“As the terrible case of Chloe Madeley showed last week, people are being abused online in the most crude and degrading fashion,” Mr Grayling added.

“This is a law to combat cruelty – and marks our determination to take a stand against a baying cyber-mob. We must send out a clear message: if you troll you risk being behind bars for two years.”

Ms Madeley welcomed the government’s decision and said that the law “obviously needs to be reviewed”.

She told the paper that being able to send malicious messages should not be considered freedom of speech, but that it should be viewed as “online terrorism”.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in