Some wearable fitness trackers may interfere with pacemakers, study suggests

‘We need to test across a broader cohort of devices and in patients with these devices’

Vishwam Sankaran
Thursday 23 February 2023 06:42 GMT
Comments
Related video: Atlanta premature baby receives experimental pacemaker

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Some wearable gadgers like fitness trackers may potentially interfere with the functioning of pacemakers and other implanted heart electronic devices.

Research published in the journal Heart Rhythm warned that despite their proven benefits, some fitness trackers could pose “serious risks” for people with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) like pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillators and cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) devices.

The functioning of CRT devices from three leading manufacturers were assessed by researchers, including those from the University of Utah, who applied a very small and imperceptible current of electricity into the body.

In this process, called bioimpedance, electrical current flows through the body and its response to the flows is measured by a sensor.

This is done to determine the person’s body composition, level of stress or vital signs like breathing rate.

“Bioimpedance sensing generated an electrical interference that exceeded Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-accepted guidelines and interfered with proper CIED functioning,” study co-author Benjamin Sanchez Terrone said in a statement.

While the findings “do not convey an immediate or clear risk” to patients wearing the trackers, the different levels emitted may result in pacing interruptions or unnecessary shocks to the heart, scientists said.

The study results, they said, “call for future clinical studies examining patients with CIEDs and wearables”.

A growing number of studies are attempting to study the ways in which general electrical appliances, including smart phones, interact with CIEDs.

Most implantable heart devices already warn patients about the likelihood of interference with electronics due to magnetic fields.

Citing an example, researchers said pacemakers come with a warning against carrying a mobile phone in a breast pocket.

The FDA warns that certain cell phones and smart watches that include high-field strength magnets may cause some implanted medical devices to switch to “magnet mode” and suspend normal operations until the magnet is moved away.

The US federal agency recommends patients keep consumer electronic devices that may create magnetic interference, such as cell phones and smart watches, at least six inches away from implanted medical devices.

But until the latest study, researchers said an objective evaluation for ensuring safety of wearable health tech like fitness trackers has not kept pace with the exciting new gadgets.

“Our research is the first to study devices that employ bioimpedance-sensing technology as well as discover potential interference problems with CIEDs such as CRT devices,” Dr Terrone said.

“We need to test across a broader cohort of devices and in patients with these devices. Collaborative investigation between researchers and industry would be helpful for keeping patients safe,” he said.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in