Elon Musk fires back at Twitter censorship critic: ‘You’re such a numbskull’
Report finds Twitter has approved 83% more censorship requests from authoritarian governments under Musk’s leadership
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Twitter boss Elon Musk, who has often touted himself as a champion of free speech, said he had no "actual choice" when accused of caving in to censorship demands made by authoritarian governments.
Since the billionaire's takeover in October last year, Twitter has approved 83 per cent more censorship requests from governments such as Turkey and India, El Pais reported.
The company reportedly received 971 requests from governments, fully acceding to 808 of them and partially acceding to 154.
The year prior to Mr Musk taking control, Twitter agreed to 50 per cent of such requests, which was in line with the compliance rate indicated in the company’s last transparency report.
The report, shared by Bloomberg columnist Matthew Yglesias, evoked an angry reaction from Mr Musk.
Mr Yglesias tweeted the report with the caption "I’m a free speech absolutist", quoting the Twitter boss.
The world's second-richest person shot back, writing: "You're such a numbskull. Please point out where we had an actual choice and we will reverse it."
The columnist responded: "Look, I’m not the one who bought Twitter amidst a blaze of proclamations about free speech principles.
"Obviously you’re within your rights to run your business however you want."
Mr Musk has repeatedly reiterated his backing for free speech both before and since the $44bn acquisition of Twitter. The “absolutist” quote refers to a tweet in March 2022 in the wake of Vladimir Putin’s unprovoked invasion of Ukraine.
"Starlink has been told by some governments (not Ukraine) to block Russian news sources. We will not do so unless at gunpoint," Mr Musk tweeted. "Sorry to be a free speech absolutist."
Yet Twitter has been accused of helping incumbent Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdogan stifle criticism by blocking several accounts in the two days before the country’s hotly contested general election.
“In response to legal process and to ensure Twitter remains available to the people of Turkey, we have taken action to restrict access to some content in Turkey today,” Twitter’s global government affairs announced, without explaining which tweets would be blocked.
Following severe criticism, Mr Musk alleged Twitter has “pushed harder for free speech than any other internet company, including Wokipedia”.
Earlier this year in India, Twitter complied after Narendra Modi’s government used emergency powers to ban content related to a BBC documentary on social media.
The two-part documentary included a previously unpublished report from the UK Foreign Office that held Mr Modi “directly responsible” for the “climate of impunity” that enabled communal violence in Gujarat state.
The riots in February 2002 killed over 1,000 people – most of them Muslims – while Mr Modi was chief minister of the state.
Justifying the consent Mr Musk said: "The rules in India for what can appear on social media are quite strict, and we can’t go beyond the laws of a country." He said doing so would put his staff at risk.
“If we have a choice of either our people going to prison or us complying with the laws, we will comply with the laws.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments