Cyber Culture: Ask.fm's new users may be walking headlong into a stormcloud of anonymous abuse
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
Debate surrounding another variety of bad online behaviour has resurfaced in the past week – again related to kids, and again because of the way anonymity allows us to behave like idiots.
The website ask.fm has come in for sustained criticism as concerns over the lack of protection it gives to its younger members begin to snowball. For those not familiar with it, it's essentially an "ask me anything" question-and-answer site where you create your own text-based chatshow; you're the guest, the rest of the ask.fm community are the hosts. Having beaten off competition from the now-defunct Formspring and vying strongly with Tumblr's "Ask" feature, ask.fm now has 57 million slightly needy users who revel in the attention it brings them.
But 50 per cent of ask.fm's users are under 18, and many are under 13, having opened accounts that violate the site's terms of service.
The problems with this are manifestly obvious; online fishing for compliments from anonymous or pseudonymous people inevitably leads to abuse, fighting and bullying, all of which can be deeply traumatic.
Ask.fm, almost an anti-Facebook, has an unregulated, slightly transgressive feel that's undoubtedly part of its allure; some of the questions thrown at you when you sign up, like "If you could do anything now, what would you do?", make is unsurprising if information that should be kept under wraps is drawn out.
Of course, bullying occurs in many forms; humans can be brutal and to lay the blame for a number of recent teenage suicides squarely at the door of ask.fm would be unfair. But the response of its founders – to say that the site merely reflects the shortcomings of society and lack of education – seems slightly irresponsible, particularly when 200,000 new users each day may be walking headlong into a stormcloud of anonymous abuse that they're simply unable to handle.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments