BlackBerry bosses try to placate shareholders

Stephen Foley
Thursday 14 July 2011 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The bosses at Research in Motion, maker of the BlackBerry, sought to buck up their shareholders with the promise of a resurgence in sales in the second half of this year, amid gloomy predictions that the company could already be in long-term decline.

Co-chief executives Jim Basillie and Mike Lazaridis told a restless shareholder meeting that a series of product launches, including smartphones based on a delayed new operating system, would ensure RIM meets its guidance for the financial year. That guidance has been cut twice in profit warnings over the past three months.

The pair deflected criticism from investors who complained the BlackBerry-maker has been mismanaged and marketed poorly as rivals Apple and Google steal its market share.

RIM's co-chiefs stuck to the script at the annual general meeting: a new generation of BlackBerrys launching this autumn will save the company. One analyst called for splitting the company up; a rebel shareholder gave them six months or they'll face calls for resignation.

But RIM avoided what would have been an embarrassing vote of confidence in its top brass when an activist shareholder withdrew a motion to force the co-founders to relinquish their other shared role as board chairman.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in