Postgraduate Lives: Colonel Angus Taverner, 48, is doing a Masters in PR at the London College of Communication
'I want to see how terrorists use PR'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.I was an officer in the Regular Army for 14 years, and one of the things I became interested in during my military career was international terrorism. For my Masters dissertation, I wanted to analyse terrorism in the context of PR theory and see whether modern-day terrorists use PR.
I've had rather a curious life, I suppose. After leaving the Regular Army in 1993 (and then joining the Territorial Army), I worked for the medical relief charity Merlin, where I first became involved in PR. In 1995, I was asked to go to Bosnia, and once there, the chap looking after media operations left and I was asked if I'd replace him. I was already interested in how people perceive an organisation and how organisations relate to people, which is at the heart of PR.
In 2000, the Army asked if I would develop the doctrine for working with the media. This was in the wake of Kosovo, where there were 3,500 journalists milling around. I then helped to establish the Army's new Defence Media Operations Centre. As I'd become so involved with PR by then, I felt it would be helpful to further my studies.
For my dissertation, I decided to focus on al-Qa'ida. First I took the public statements made by the al-Qa'ida leadership, mainly Osama bin Laden, and did a discourse analysis. I looked at both written and verbal statements to see how language was used - especially words such as jihad ("holy war") - and then tracked this over time. In the mid-1990s, the focus was on Islam as a rejection of the West, but as time went on, the rhetoric became more anti-Western and with more references to the US.
I then searched for words such as jihad in the databases of five newspapers and broadcasters, including The New York Times and the Gulf News, to plot their frequency. What I found was that nobody made any mention of Bin Laden or al-Qa'ida until they started to blow things up. In 1996, Bin Laden declared jihad against the West and not a single newspaper mentioned it. In 1998 there was a further declaration and again there was no mention in the Western media I looked at. It only began to be mentioned when embassies in Africa were attacked, but the point at which al-Qa'ida really took off was 9/11. This planted in the Western media a discussion about Islamic issues. Al-Qa'ida has reawakened the West to the Islamic world. As an exercise in PR it's been hugely successful.
What I've concluded is that terrorism is a combination of message and violence, and to be successful you need both. I've also found that the way PR is usually defined - as a way to generate good will - is wrong. Organisations also use PR for ill will.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments