Thwarted smokers are less efficient workers

Tuesday 13 June 2000 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Smokers who are not allowed to light up at their desks are less efficient and effective employees because the urge to smoke interferes with their ability to be accurate.

Smokers who are not allowed to light up at their desks are less efficient and effective employees because the urge to smoke interferes with their ability to be accurate.

Research shows that for 10 or 15 minutes after people have the urge to smoke, their accuracy drops from 65 per cent to less than 50 per cent.

The authors said that companies could be losing up to an hour a day in productive work if they did not allow their employees to smoke at their desks or in a nearby smoking room. Many companies now operate no-smoking offices, which means that employees have to go outside the building to smoke.

Carol Madden of Florida State University, who conducted the research, said that the urge to smoke may impair different parts of the working memory, which reduce people's ability to be accurate. "Companies could be losing a lot of money because of poor accuracy," she said.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in