Vince Cable calls for restraint of university bosses' pay
Business Secretary's comments come after it was revealed vice-chancellors enjoyed an 8.1% average salary hike in 2012-2013, compared to just 1% for ordinary staff
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Vince Cable has called for 'restraint' for university vice-chancellors' and senior management's soaring pay packets.
Last week it was revealed vice-chancellors enjoyed an 8.1 per cent average salary hike in 2012-2013, compared to just 1 per cent for ordinary staff.
“Whilst universities are independent organisations with many sources of income, they do benefit from public subsidy,” Mr Cable said.
“I’m sure taxpayers would expect some degree of restraint in the salaries of top managers of universities at a time when public sector pay is still under pressure.”
The Business Secretary’s comments came in response to a letter from the secretary general of the University and College Union (UCU) Sally Hunt calling on universities to explain their executives’ high pay rises to the public.
Ms Hunt demanded that the minutes of remuneration committees be made publicly available, including the justification for pay increases.
She added there should be staff representatives on remuneration committees and urged institutions to publish an annual list of the pay and benefits of vice-chancellors and principals.
“Despite promising to cut back on excessive pay at the top, vice-chancellors continue to hide behind the shadowy remuneration committee when it comes to their pay rises,” she said.
“Vice-chancellors have no problem accepting large rises while at the same time telling their staff there’s no money available and that they must accept another real-terms pay cut.
“Their continued avarice is an embarrassment for the sector and we urgently need some transparency.”
Last week it was revealed that university bosses at Russell Group universities received a salary rise of more than £22,000 to nearly £293,000 in 2012-13.
The union says when pension payments are included, the vice-chancellors received an average package of £318,500, up from £302,500 in 2011-12.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments