Your support helps us to tell the story
As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.
Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.
Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election
Andrew Feinberg
White House Correspondent
A Sikh college student – who said he could not join the US Army unless he violated his religious beliefs by removing his turban, shaving and cutting his hair – said he is “excited and nervous” after the decision was upheld in court.
20-year-old Iknoor Singh from Queens in New York said he has had a lifelong interest in public service and began thinking of a military career several years ago.
The finance and business analytics student at Long Island’s Hofstra University told the Associated Press last year: “It has been one of those passions and dreams.
“If you look back in history, Sikhs have a very rich military tradition. We have always stood up to oppression and stand up for justice.”
Sikhism – a 500-year-old religion, originally founded in India – requires male followers to wear a turban and beard and keep their hair uncut as a mark of respect to the founders of the faith.
Under a policy announced by the Reserve Officer Training Corps last January, troops can seek waivers on a case-by-case basis to wear religious clothing, seek prayer time or participate in religious practices.
Approval depends on where the service member is stationed and whether the change would affect military duties and there are currently only a few Sikhs serving in the US army who have been granted religious accommodations.
When Mr Singh was told he must comply with military rules – and only then ask for a waiver that would allow him to wear his turban, beard and long hair – the groups United Sikhs and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) were forced to file a federal lawsuit last November in Washington, DC.
Last week, however, U.S. District Court Judge, Amy Berman Jackson, declared that Mr Singh’s devotion to his religious beliefs would not diminish his ability to serve in the military.
She added: “It is difficult to see how accommodating [the] plaintiff’ s religious exercise would do greater damage to the Army’s compelling interests in uniformity, discipline, credibility, unit cohesion and training than the tens of thousands of medical shaving profiles the Army has already granted.”
Army spokesman, Lt. Col. Ben Garrett, said in a statement that the decision is currently being examined. He said: “The Army takes pride in sustaining a culture where all personnel are treated with dignity and respect and not discriminated against based on race, colour, religion, gender and national origin.”
Mr Singh acknowledged: “Becoming an officer is not an easy thing. You have to be proficient in many areas.”
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments