Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Oxford University apologises after students were emailed a list of their worst-performing peers' marks

 

Sophie Murray-Morris
Tuesday 14 January 2014 16:11 GMT
Comments
(Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Oxford University has apologised after an administrator accidentally emailed a list of poorly performing students’ marks to their peers yesterday.

The email disclosed the names of students who were awarded marks graded 2.2 and below in their first-term exams at University College.

The Oxford Student newspaper reported that a mistake on an Excel document meant that the names and marks of almost 50 students were sent out on an email originally written to inform students of timetables for upcoming exams.

Abigail Reeves, president of the University College’s JCR, said that the staff member responsible was “mortified” by the mistake.

Dr Anne Knowland, who is the senior tutor of University College, said: “We would like to apologise to all students affected by this inadvertent disclosure for any distress this has caused and reassure them that we are investigating exactly how this happened and are determined to make sure this does not happen again. University College takes the treatment of sensitive data very seriously.”

It is believed that the email may have been sent to hundreds of students. The college has 372 undergraduate and 221 graduate students.

Tam Guobadia, a second-year law student who was listed as one of the students with bad results, said: “I personally find it quite funny but I understand why some people might be upset”.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in