Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Cambridge college bans ‘Around the World in 80 Days’ themed event for fear it could cause offence

Move comes after Free Speech University Rankings 2016 find Britain's universities to be in the grip of 'an epidemic' when it comes to bans

Aftab Ali
Student Editor
Thursday 10 March 2016 18:11 GMT
Comments
The Junior Parlour Committee at Pembroke College - part of the University of Cambridge, pictured - sparked debate after emailing students about the cancellation
The Junior Parlour Committee at Pembroke College - part of the University of Cambridge, pictured - sparked debate after emailing students about the cancellation (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Student leaders at a Cambridge college have sparked debate over its decision to cancel an event themed ‘Around the World In 80 Days’ event - for fear it could cause offence.

The Junior Parlour Committee (JPC) at Pembroke College broke the news in an email, after which “anger erupted” on Facebook, reports The Tab, as students debated the change of the theme of the event known as the ‘bop’.

In the email, the JPC said it had “discussed the matter at length,” adding: “The JPC have decided that the most appropriate action is to break with the tradition of reusing finalists’ first year BOP theme, in their end of Lent term third year BOP.

“Instead we are using an alternative theme, to avoid the potential for offense to be caused by the theme ‘Around the World in 80 Days’.”

Writing in The Tab, Cambridge law undergraduate Shani WijetilakaIn described the reaction to the email which ensued in the Pembroke Exchange Facebook group.

She said: “Those in favour of the original theme claimed that ‘deliberately changing the theme implies the student body isn’t capable of dressing appropriately by itself’.”

She also said one post - which accused the JPC’s final decision as being “overly controlling and a little insulting” - garnered more than 100 likes.

Other students in the group, reported Ms WijetilakaIn, said that, instead of the theme being seen as “inappropriate and racist,” the JPC should have, in fact, seen it as a way to “appreciate a diversity of cultures.”

The Independent has contacted the JPC for comment.

Similar moves have been made in recent months by other students’ unions. Edinburgh University Students’ Association banned students from dressing as Caitlyn Jenner and Pocahontas after outlining a strict costume policy. Dressing as Pocahontas, said the EUSA, would be “stereotyping Native American culture” while posing as Jenner mock the LGBT community.

The 20 hardest universities to get into

The University of East Anglia students’ union also prohibited sombreros from being handed out by a local Mexican eatery at a freshers’ fair for fear they could be seen as being ‘racist’.

The JPC news has come shortly after spiked magazine’s Free Speech University Rankings (FSUR) 2016 showed Britain’s universities to be in the grip of “an epidemic” when it comes to bans and the stifling of free speech on campuses.

Compared with the previous year’s findings, FSUR said students’ unions continue to be “significantly more censorious” than universities, and were over four times more likely to be flagged up ‘red’ than the actual universities themselves.

Coordinator of the rankings, Tom Slater, described how universities are meant to be spaces reserved for “unfettered debate and the pursuit of truth.” He said: “In a time when campus bureaucrats see students as too vulnerable - or too easily led - to listen to difficult ideas, the entire purpose of the academy is being undermined - and the bar for censorship is only getting lower.

“Bans on allegedly transphobic feminists sit alongside bans of allegedly racist sombreros. Today, students aren’t even trusted to dress themselves - let alone think for themselves.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in