Leading article: When too much isn't enough

Thursday 20 November 2003 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The news that almost 50 per cent of the on-the-job-training that employers provide for adults is substandard is a severe jolt for the Government in its drive to improve skills in the workforce. The upshot is that many adults drop out of their courses, giving the United Kingdom one of the worst-trained workforces in the Western world. The best that can be said for the findings in the Adult Learning Inspectorate's annual report, published this week, is that things are not as bleak as they were last year. Then, the figure was 60 per cent.

Reaction has ranged from political criticism of the Government for presiding over such a dog's dinner of a system (the Lib Dems) to a call from the Association of Colleges for training providers to be forced to apply for a licence to operate before setting up in business.

Why is the training given to adults in work of such poor quality? David Sherlock, the Chief Inspector of Adult Learning, puts his finger on the problem. In the UK, adults can train for up to 2,000 different vocational qualifications. In most other countries, the maximum is 20 to 30. As a result, most providers don't understand enough about the qualifications on offer to lay on the courses that people need. Reducing the number of qualifications should be a top priority for ministers, according to Sherlock. He suggests losing about 100 as a starter. We agree. Mike Tomlinson, the former chief schools inspector who is in charge of the Government's inquiry into education for 14 to 19-year-olds, also agrees, and he has the wherewithal to push Sherlock's recommendations forward. He can ensure that the diploma he is advocating to replace the existing A-level, GCSE and vocational education system offers high-quality courses that employers and training providers can understand. That must be a priority for his final report next year, and one that ministers should accept.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in