World Athletics says transgender policy not set in stone after athlete criticism
The global organisation is consulting with member federations over a new policy.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.World Athletics says its transgender policy is still a work in progress after a British shot-putter said the governing body’s preferred option would “screw” female athletes.
The global organisation is consulting with member federations over its preferred option for a new policy.
World Athletics confirmed on Monday that its current preferred option would halve the maximum level of plasma testosterone permitted for trans women compared to the current regulations, and double the period of time to two years that athletes must remain below that threshold in order to compete.
Putting forward a preferred option is the best way to gather constructive feedback, but this does not mean this is the option that will be presented to Council or indeed adopted.
However, it says nothing is set in stone and that the final proposal presented to World Athletics’ Council in March could be very different.
“In terms of our female eligibility regulations, we will follow the science and the decade and more of the research we have in this area in order to protect the female category, maintain fairness in our competitions, and remain as inclusive as possible,” a statement from the global governing body read.
“In reviewing a number of new and existing studies and observations from the field, we have put forward a preferred option for consultation with our member federations. Once we have this feedback at the end of January, we will consult, in a targeted way, more widely.
“The option currently under consultation is to amend both the transgender and DSD female eligibility regulations to provide for a continuous reduction of serum testosterone level below 2.5 nmol/L for at least 24 months. Putting forward a preferred option is the best way to gather constructive feedback, but this does not mean this is the option that will be presented to Council or indeed adopted.”
British shot-putter Amelia Strickler does not believe World Athletics’ current preferred option goes far enough to protect biological women in the sport.
She told the Daily Telegraph: “The fact that World Athletics, one of the biggest (sports governing bodies), has not put its foot down, I think it is really, really upsetting. I think these rules really could open the floodgates.
“I haven’t come across anyone who is like ‘Oh, it will be fine.’ Even the guys are like ‘Yeah, you’re screwed’.
“There are jokes made (in training) like ‘Oh yeah, I feel like being a woman today.”
Swimming’s world governing body FINA announced in June that any athlete who had gone through any part of male puberty would be barred from its elite-level female events.
UK’s sports governing bodies were urged by former Culture Secretary Nadine Dorries to follow swimming’s lead, saying the issue had been “ducked” for too long.