Why would you want to blank an end in curling?
Teams can opt to blank an end in order to retain the hammer for the next one
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.There was a moment of confusion in the curling match between Team GB and Canada in the Winter Olympics on Monday, as the Canadians passed up the opportunity to score a point by intentionally missing the ring with the final shot of the end.
But why would you want to blank an end in curling?
With the score at 1-1 and the ring wide open in the fourth, the Canada team decided to blank the end in order to retain the hammer, which is the term for the team with the last-stone advantage.
Since it was a close game, Canada perhaps wanted to retain their advantage for an end in which they had an opportunity to score multiple points.
This is because the scoring team must give up the hammer for the next end.
As it turned out, that opportunity presented itself in the following end, as Canada were able to score three points with their final stone as they already had two rocks in the ring.
They didn’t have the opportunity to do so in the previous one, so it was a sensible decision to wait for a better scoring chance.
Of course, had it been the final end in the match, Canada would have just taken the point to win the match.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments