Friedl and Hantuchova impress the few who bothered
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Never can there have been two such contrasting finals in one day at All England Club. While Goran Ivanisevic was making history on Centre Court, Leos Friedl of the Czech Republic and Slovakia's Daniela Hantuchova were taking the mixed doubles title on No 1 Court. They defeated America's Mike Bryan and South Africa's Liezel Huber in three sets, 4-6, 6-3, 6-2.
Friedl and Hantuchova's victory was remarkable firstly for the fact that neither player had ever been involved in any kind of doubles competition before arriving in SW19 this year, but also the biggest match of their lives attracted the smallest-ever crowd on a Wimbledon show court. At its busiest, there were 124 people inside No 1 Court, which has a capacity of 11,500. The 124 die-hards included the four players, the umpire, 10 line judges, six ball boys and girls, nine covers attendants, 23 stewards, 13 members of the players' entourages, six cameramen, two photographers, six All England Club officials and 44 members of the public.
"If someone had said to me before we started the tournament that we'd end up as the winners, I would have said they were mad," Friedl said afterwards. "But I'm very happy, and maybe putting us on No 1 Court away from the attention was not such a bad thing."
At several points in the game, the cheers from the hill overlooking the screen outside No 1 Court drowned out the action inside.
The turning point came in the second set, with Bryan and Huber a set up and the score at 3-3. Huber was distracted when she thought a bad call had been made against her, although the ball was clearly out. She lost concentration and did not recover.
"You shouldn't be in the chair," Huber had said to the umpire at the crucial moment. "This is a Wimbledon final." Not that you'd have known it yesterday.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments