Swimming: Britain unlikely to join Swedish-led boycott of World Cup event in Peking
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Britain are unlikely to follow the lead set by Sweden and pull out of the World Cup short-course meeting in Peking next month despite the continuing outrage at the Chinese drug scandal.
The British federation could find itself in dispute with Fina, the sport's governing body, if it boycotted the event, one at which it plans to give a development squad of young swimmers the chance to gain international experience ahead of the Sydney Olympics in 2000.
World Cup meetings in Britain - Sheffield stages one in March and Glasgow another in 1999 - could be at risk if Britain withdrew.
David Sparkes, secretary of the British federation, said that the contract with Fina meant that to stage a World Cup meeting you had to commit yourself to going to every one outside your own.
"Sweden are breaking the rules by boycotting the event because they also hold a meeting. That sends a message to China that they, too, can ignore the rule book," he said.
Fina moved to refute suggestions that they could banish China from international competition for four years because four of their swimmers had tested positive within a 12-month period.
The rule can only be applied if the drug is steroids - the three females and one male caught in a pre-World Championships swoop last week gave positive tests for a diuretic not a steroid, although it is commonly used to mask detection of more potent illegal substances like steroids.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments