Squash: Ultimatum on player boycott
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE men's event at the English National Championships will be scrapped unless a compromise worked out yesterday by the Squash Rackets Association's chief executive, Chris Gotla, and the England captain, Philip Whitlock, is agreed by the rest of the players threatening a boycott.
They have until 4 January to make up their minds after which a cancellation will take place because disruption over who does intend to play would make a draw 'farcical', according to yesterday's SRA press statement.
This also claims that 'pressure is being put on the players by an unknown source to continue their boycott' - although it is well-known many of them have been upset about a range of issues for some time. The rebels now appear to be divided, with perhaps four of the top 10 (including, according to the SRA, the British national champion Peter Marshall) supporting the new plan.
This includes an agreement by the SRA to drop England selection criteria this year in return for a players' commitment to support future national championships with an agreed minimum prize fund. At the moment selection is dependent on participation in the nationals, which means there is a risk of England being without a team worth the name for next year's world championship.
The original demands from the top 20 players included higher prize-money and a return to the title of British National Championships. Now the stakes may be higher. 'Philip (Whitlock) and I . . . agreed that the future of not only the national championships but the whole professional game in this country was at stake,' Gotla said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments