Sports letters: Whistler's bother

R. A. Bradford
Thursday 02 March 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

rom R A Bradford

Sir: I often find myself agreeing with the humorously misanthropic Alan Watkins in his weekly article on rugby union; when he expressed the opinion that the referee was the most important person on the field, he was highlighting the game's apparently irremovable defect. There must be very few decent referees about because some barely competent referees have, as usual, been appointed to international matches this season. Fortunately, there have been some good matches in spite of the laws and poor refereeing.

Rob Andrew's view, which is a commonly held and sensible one, is that only the best referees should be appointed for these big games in the same way that only the best players play in them. No reasonable man could disagree with that proposition.

Players do play to the limit of the laws and beyond, but they are only partly to blame. When some of the most able and best coached teams in England can come off the field spitting with anger and frustration, whether rightly or wrongly, at England's supposedly best referees, there is a serious problem that no one seems to have addressed effectively.

Important matches are being decided by very subjective and sometimes blatantly incorrect judgements; most mistakes can be forgiven but not those relating to scores. The referees and those who control them seem to forget that the game is for the players; if it is too difficult to referee effectively (as it clearly is) then it must be simplified.

Yours faithfully,

R A BRADFORD

Middle Rasen, Lincs

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in