Sports Letters: What about the player's rights?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I read Steve Coppell's defence of the 'manager' (1 November) with some interest, especially his comments with regard to Tim Flowers, and his agent, Jerome Anderson. As one who earns part of his living representing footballers I was amused to learn that 'a transfer was finalised and everyone was reasonably happy'. Everyone apparently does not include the player - the person concerned in the deal, who according to Coppell's philosophy is not to be consulted. How sad for all concerned, especially Southampton, who wish to break the player's contract, that Flowers should choose to exercise his right to say no.
If the player decided that it was not in his interest to stay at Southampton, or to wait until a more suitable move was arranged, then that is his perfect right. As a disinterested observer, I understand that Flowers did not ask for a transfer, and if Southampton wish to cash in on his contract to their own financial advantage and convenience, then perhaps they would have been better advised to have discussed the matter with the player beforehand.
As for Souness, if he thought he was improving his chances of signing the player by berating Anderson, then it seems, thus far, to have been a mistaken policy.
Yours,
JON HOLMES
Nottingham
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments