Sports Letter: Rough and smooth
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The furore over the Atherton affair has tended to obscure what seems to be a curious anomaly in the rules - or lack of them - relating to tampering with the ball.
At any cricket match nowadays bowlers and members of the fielding side may be seen furiously polishing one side of the ball on their clothing to produce a shine which would otherwise have disappeared in the normal course of play. This is apparently within the rules and is accepted without question, except perhaps by those spectators who perceive it as a contributory factor to the slow over-rate.
Thus, it is quite in order to use artificial means to make one side of the ball smoother, but totally unacceptable to make the other side rougher.
It will no doubt be argued that there is a difference but, since the intention is broadly the same, where should one draw the line?
Yours,
E G WREN
Kilmarnock
29 July
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments