Sports letter: No sense in sales policy at Palace

Sue Donato
Wednesday 13 January 1999 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: After Michael Owen, Matt Jansen is the most exciting young forward in the country. Don't just take that from Crystal Palace fans like me: ask Peter Taylor, manager of the England Under-21 team, or Four Four Two magazine, which recently voted him the best striker outside the Premiership.

Jansen had the chance last season to join Manchester United but chose instead to come to Palace, despite the fact that relegation from the Premiership looked likely. He recently signed a new long-term contract, says he enjoys working under Terry Venables and has apparently moved into a new home near the club's training ground. So why on earth are Palace contemplating selling him to Newcastle United?

We Palace supporters are a long-suffering lot, but the sale of Jansen, particularly at a giveaway fee of pounds 4m, would be the final straw. Since last summer we have witnessed the sale of a succession of good players - Marc Edworthy, Dean Gordon, Neil Shipperley and Bruce Dyer to name just four - to be replaced by vastly inferior signings. Venables might complain with some justification about a lack of transfer funds, but the fact is that he has still had plenty of money to spend.

The problem is that money has been spent on players like Lee Bradbury (pounds 1.5m) and David Amsalem (pounds 850,000) who are simply not up to the task.

SUE DONATO

Croydon

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in